Статья боковой панель

Опубликована
30 Сентябрь 2023
Файлы
PDF
Статистика
Прочитано : 110 Число скачиваний : 71

Основная статья Содержание

Детали статьи

Об авторе

Ольга Владимировна Гордякова, Московский институт психоанализа

кандидат психологических наук (19.00.05), профессор, кафедра социальной психологии НОЧУ ВО «Московский институт психоанализа»

Как цитировать
[1]
Гордякова, О.В. и Ванин, А.В. 2023. Ценностно-аффективная поляризация социальных групп. Ученые записки Института психологии РАН. 3, 3(9) (сен. 2023), 74–80.
Скачать ссылку
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

Литература

  1. Affective polarization
  2. Bruin D., Baar J., FeldmanHall O. (2023). Shared neural representations and temporal segmentation of political content predict ideological similarity // SCIENCE ADVANCES. 9, eabq5920.
  3. Torcal M., Reiljan A., Zanotti L. (2023). Editorial: Affective polarization in comparative perspective // Frontiers in Political Science. Sec. Political Participation. Vol.5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2023.1112238
  4. Johnston R. (2023). Affective Polarization in the Canadian Party System, 1988–2021 // Canadian Journal of Political Science. V.56. Pp.372–395. doi:10.1017/S0008423923000112
  5. Jenke L. (2023). Afective Polarization and Misinformation Belief // Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09851-w
  6. Gidron N., Adams J., Horne W. (2023). Who Dislikes Whom? Affective Polarization between Pairs of Parties in Western Democracies // British Journal of Political Science. V.53. Pp. 997–1015. doi:10.1017/S0007123422000394
  7. Estrada M.S., Juarez Y., Piña-García C.A. (2022). Toxic Social Media: Affective Polarization After Feminist Protests // Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221098343
  8. Santoro E., Broockman D.E. (2022). The promise and pitfalls of cross-partisan conversations for reducing affective polarization: Evidence from randomized experiments. Supplementary Materials // Science Advances. V.8. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv. abn5515
  9. Bradley M., Chauchard S. (2022.) The Ethnic Origins of Affective Polarization: Statistical Evidence From Cross-National Data // Frontiers in Political Science. V.4. doi: 10.3389/fpos.2022.920615
  10. Brandt M.J., Vallabha Sh. (2022). Intraindividual Changes in Political Identity Strength are Associated with Political Animosity in the United States and the Netherlands. Michigan State University. 2022_State and trait affective polarization.pdf
  11. Balcells L., Kuo A. (2022). Secessionist conflict and affective polarization. Evidence from Catalonia. 2022_Secessionist conflict and affective polarization Evidence from Catalonia.pdf
  12. Nelson M.H. (2022). Resentment Is Like Drinking Poison? The Heterogeneous Health Effects of Affective Polarization // Journal of Health and Social Behavior. Vol. 63(4). Pp. 508–524. DOI: 10.1177/00221465221075311
  13. Bettarelli L., Haute E.V. (2022). Regional inequalities as drivers of affective polarization // Regional Studies, Regional Science. V.9. I.1, Pp.549-570. DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2022.2117077
  14. Kekkonen A., Suuronen A., Kawecki D., Strandberg K. (2022). Puzzles in affective polarization research: Party attitudes, partisan social distance, and multiple party identification // Frontiers in Political Science. V.4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.920567
  15. Renström E.A., Bäck H., Carroll R. (2022). Protecting the Ingroup? Authoritarianism, Immigration Attitudes, and Affective Polarization // Frontiers in Political Science. V.4. doi: 10.3389/fpos.2022.919236
  16. Floresa A., Colea J.C., Dickertc S., Eom K. et al. (2022). Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for COVID-19 management policies across countries // PNAS. Vol. 119. №. 3. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117543119
  17. Bettarelli L., Close C., Haute E. Is Protest Only Negative? Examining the Effect of Emotions and Affective Polarization on Protest Behaviour // Politics and Governance. V.10. №4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5665
  18. Voelkel J.G., Chu J., Stagnaro M.N., Mernyk J.S., Redekopp C., Pink S.L., Druckman J.N., Rand D.G., Willer R. (2022). Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes // Nature Human Behaviour. V.7. Pp.55–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01466-9
  19. Tornberg P. (2022). How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting // PNAS. Vol. 119. № 42. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2207159119
  20. Casas A., Menchen Trevino E., Wojcieszak M. (2022). Exposure to Extremely Partisan News from the Other Political Side Shows Scarce Boomerang Effects // Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09769-9
  21. Simonsson O., Bazin O., Fisher S.D., Goldberg S.B. (2022). Effects of an 8 Week Mindfulness Course on Afective Polarization // Mindfulness. V.13. Pp.474–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01808-0
  22. Adams J., Bracken D., Gidron N., Horne W., O’Brien D.Z., Senk K. (2022). Can’t We All Just Get Along? How Women MPs Can Ameliorate Affective Polarization in Western Publics // American Political Science Review. Vol.117. Issue 1. Pp. 318-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000491
  23. Simonsson O., Goldberg S.B., Marks J., Yan L., Narayanan J. (2022). Bridging the (Brexit) divide: Effects of a brief befriending meditation on affective polarization // PLoS ONE. V.17(5). https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267493
  24. Phillips J. (2022). Afective Polarization: Over Time, Through the Generations, and During the Lifespan // Political Behavior. V. 44. Pp.1483–1508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09784-4
  25. Segovia C. (2022). Affective polarization in low-partisanship societies. The case of Chile 1990–2021 // Frontiers in Political Science. V.4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.928586
  26. Bettarelli L., Haute E. (2022). Affective polarization and coalition preferences in times of pandemic // Frontiers in Political Science. Vol.4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.945161
  27. Bettarelli L., Reiljan A., Haute E. (2023). A regional perspective to the study of affective polarization // European Journal of Political Research. V.62 Pp. 645–659. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12548
  28. Polarization of Attitudes
  29. Horcajo J., Briñol P., Paredes B., Petty R.E., DeMarree K.G., See Y.M. (2022). Polarization of Attitudes as a Function of Mortality Salience: A Meta-Cognitive Analysis // Psicothema. Vol. 34, No. 2, Pp.226-232. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2021.334
  30. Luskin R.C., Sood G., Fishkin J.S., Hahn K.S. (2022). Deliberative Distortions? Homogenization, Polarization, and Domination in Small Group Discussions // British Journal of Political Science. V.52, Pp.1205–1225. doi:10.1017/S0007123421000168
  31. Monsted B., Lehmann S. (2022). Characterizing polarization in online vaccine discourse – A large-scale study // PLOS ONE. V.17(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263746
  32. Ye Y., Zhang R., Zhao Y., Yu Y., Du W., Chen T. (2022). A Novel Public Opinion Polarization Model Based on BA Network // Systems. V.10 (2). Pp. 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10020046
  33. Belief polarization
  34. Baumgaertner B., Justwan F. (2022). The preference for belief, issue polarization, and echo chambers // Synthese. 200:412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03880-y
  35. Begby E. (2022). From Belief Polarization to Echo Chambers: A Rationalizing Account // Episteme. Pp.1–21. doi:10.1017/epi.2022.14
  36. Gene A., Iftekhar H. (2022). Belief polarization and Covid-19 // Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers. № 10. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:fi:bof-202209201384
  37. Rekker R., Harteveld E. (2022). Understanding factual belief polarization: the role of trust, political sophistication, and affective polarization // Acta Politica. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-022-00265-4
  38. Political Polarization
  39. Piazza J.A. (2022). Political Polarization and Political Violence // Forthcoming, Security Studies. 2022_Political Polarization and Political Violence.pdf
  40. Dolman A.J., Fraser T., Panagopoulos C., Aldrich D.P., Kim D. (2022). Opposing views: associations of political polarization, political party affiliation, and social trust with COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt // JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH. Vol. 45, № 1, Pp. 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab401
  41. Borah A., Singh S.R. (2022). Investigating political polarization in India through the lens of Twitter // Social Network Analysis and Mining. V. 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-00939-z
  42. Proaño Acosta Ch., Peña J.C., Saalfeld T. (2020). Inequality, macroeconomic performance and political polarization: A panel analysis of 20 advanced democracies. BERG. Working Paper Series, № 157. 2022_Inequality, macroeconomic performance and political polarization a panel analysis of 20 advanced democracies.pdf
  43. Lee A.H. (2022). Social Trust in Polarized Times: How Perceptions of Political Polarization Afect Americans’ Trust in Each Other // Political Behavior. V.44. Pp.1533–1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09787-1
  44. Psychological polarization
  45. Salvi C., Iannello P., Cancer A., Cooper S.E., McClay M., Dunsmoor J.E., Antonietti A. (2023). Does social rigidity predict cognitive rigidity? Profles of socio cognitive polarization // Psychological Research. V.87. Pp. 2533–2547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01832-w
  46. Henkel L., Sprengholz Ph., Korn L., Betsch C., Böhm R. (2023). The association between vaccination status identification and societal polarization // Nature Human Behaviour. Vol. 7. Pp.231–239. DOI:10.1038/s41562-022-01469-6. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-022-01469-6
  47. Kvam P.D., Alaukik A., Mims C.E., Martemyanova A., Baldwin M. (2022). Rational inference strategies and the genesis of polarization and extremism // Scientifc Reports. V.12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11389-0
  48. Webster S.W., Albertson B. (2022). Emotion and Politics: Noncognitive Psychological Biases in Public Opinion // Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 25. Pp.401-418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-105353
  49. Social polarization
  50. Brown G., Lewandowsky S., Huang Zh. (2022). Social Sampling and Expressed Attitudes: Authenticity Preference and Social Extremeness Aversion Lead to Social Norm Effects and Polarization // Psychological Review. Vol. 129, №1, Pp.18–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000342
  51. Kaiser J., Vaccari C., Chadwick A. (2022). Partisan Blocking: Biased Responses to Shared Misinformation Contribute to Network Polarization on Social Media // Journal of Communication. Vol.72, Issue 2, Pp. 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac002
  52. Balinhas D. (2023). Bringing critical social psychology to the study of political polarization // Social and Personality Psychology Compass. V.17. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12721
  53. Jahani E., Gallagher N., Merhout F., Cavalli N., Guilbeault D., Leng Y., Bail C.A. (2022). An Online experiment during the 2020 US–Iran crisis shows that exposure to common enemies can increase political polarization // Scientifc Reports. V.12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23673-0
  54. Social media polarization
  55. Stray J., Iyer R., Larrauri H.P. (2023). The Algorithmic Management of Polarization and Violence on Social Media. 2023_The Algorithmic Management of Polarization and Violence on Social Media.pdf
  56. Bizel G., Singh A.K. (2023). Political Polarization, Misinformation, and Sentiments: A Social Media Analysis About ‘Capitol Hill 2021 Attack’ by Tweets // Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences. V. 9(61). Pp.2257-2266. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/JOS HAS.64755
  57. Jacob D., Banisch S. (2023). Polarization in Social Media: A Virtual Worlds-based Approach // Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. V.26(3). Url: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/26/3/11.html
  58. Overgaard C., Collier J.R. (2023). In different worlds: The contributions of polarization and platforms to partisan (mis)perceptions // New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231176551
  59. Casares O.L. (2023). Diversify the Accounts You Follow: The Effects of Social Media on Political Polarization in Mexico. Tesis que para obtener el t´ıtulo de Licenciado en Econom´ıa. Asesora Dr. Horacio Alejandro Larreguy Arbesu´. 2023_Diversify the Accounts You Follow The Effects of Social Media on Political Polarization in Mexico.pdf
  60. Lev‐On A. (2022). Polarization of Deliberative and Participatory Activists on Social Media // Media and Communication. Vol.10, Issue 4, Pp. 56–65. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5637
  61. Coscia M., Rossi L. (2022). How minimizing conflicts could lead to polarization on social media: An agent-based model investigation // PLoS ONE. V.17(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263184
  62. Fagni T., Cresci S. (2022). Fine-Grained Prediction of Political Leaning on Social Media with Unsupervised Deep Learning // Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. V.73. Pp. 633-672. 2022_Fine-grained Prediction of Political Leaning on Social Media with Unsupervised Deep Learning.pdf
  63. Jones-Jang S.M., Chung M. (2022). Can we blame social media for polarization? Counterevidence against filter bubble claims during the COVID-19 pandemic // New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221099591
  64. Németh R. (2023). A scoping review on the use of natural language processing in research on political polarization: trends and research prospects // Journal of Computational Social Science. V.6. Pp.289–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-022-00196-2
  65. Polarization and conflict
  66. Cardona D., Freitas J., Rubí Barceló A. (2023). Polarization and confict among groups with heterogeneous members // Social Choice and Welfare. V.61. Pp.199–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-022-01446-y
  67. Scherman A., Etchegaray N., Browne M., Mazorra D., Rojas H. (2022). WhatsApp, Polarization, and Non-Conventional Political Participation: Chile and Colombia Before the Social Outbursts of 2019 // Media and Communication. Vol.10, Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5817
  68. Ray D. (2022). ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, POLARIZATION AND CONFLICT. New York University. 2022_ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, POLARIZATION AND CONFLICT.pdf
  69. People polarization
  70. Hohmann M. et al. (2023). Quantifying ideological polarization on a network using generalized Euclidean distance. Supplementary Materials. Science Advances, 9. 2023_Quantifying ideological polarization on a network using generalized Euclidean distance.pdf
  71. Kurschilgen M. (2023). Moral awareness polarizes people’s fairness judgments // Social Choice and Welfare. V.61, Pp.339–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-023-01454-6
  72. Malloy C.S., Hughes C., Cassidy B.S. (2023). Perceiver and target partisanship shift facial trustworthiness effects on likability // Scientifc Reports. V.13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33307-8
  73. Zimmerman F., Pedraza L., Navajas J., Balenzuela P. (2023). Attraction by ingroup coherence drives the emergence of ideological sorting. 2023_Attraction by ingroup coherence drives the emergence of ideological sorting.pdf
  74. Charron N., Lapuente V., Rodriguez-Pose A. (2023). Uncooperative society, uncooperative politics or both? Trust, polarization, populism and COVID-19 deaths across European regions // European Journal of Political Research. Vol.62, Issue3. Pp.781-805. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12529
  75. Bozdağ Ç., Koçer S. (2022). Skeptical Inertia in the Face of Polarization: News Consumption and Misinformation in Turkey // Media and Communication. Vol. 10. №2. Issue 2, Pp. 169–179. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.5057
  76. Leota J., Simpson D., Mazidi D., Nash K. (2023). Purity, politics, and polarization: Political ideology moderates threat-induced shifts in moral purity beliefs // British Journal of Social Psychology. Volume 62, Issue 2. Pp. 806–824. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12596
  77. Zafeiris A. (2022). Opinion polarization in human communities can emerge as a natural consequence of beliefs being interrelated // Entropy. V.24(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/e24091320
  78. Torcal M., Magalhães P.C. (2022). Ideological extremism, perceived party system polarization, and support for democracy // European Political Science Review. V.14. Issue 2. Pp. 188–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773922000066
  79. Cantini R., Marozzo F., Talia D., Tunfio P. (2022). Analyzing Political Polarization on Social Media by Deleting Bot Spamming // Big Data and Cognitive Computing. V.6(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc6010003
  80. Ideological polarization
  81. Erkel P., Turkenburg E. (2022). Delving into the divide: how ideological differences fuel out-party hostility in a multi-party context // European Political Science Review. V.14(3). Pp. 386–402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773922000121
  82. Wollebæk D., Fladmoe A., Steen-Johnsen K., Ihlen, Ø. (2022). Right-wing ideological constraint and vaccine refusal: The case of the COVID-19 vaccine in Norway // Scandinavian Political Studies. V.45, Pp.253–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/scps.12224
  83. Opinion polarization
  84. Keijzer M.A., Mäs M. (2022). The complex link between filter bubbles and opinion polarization // Data Science. V.5, Pp.139–166. 2022_The complex link between filter bubbles and opinion polarization.pdf
  85. Lim S.L., Bentley P.J. (2022). Opinion amplifcation causes extreme polarization in social networks // Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22856-z 2022_Opinion amplification causes extreme polarization in social networks.pdf
  86. Hood M.V., McKee S.C. (2022). Getting the Message: Opinion Polarization over Election Law // Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics and Policy. Vol. 21. Issue 2. Pp.124-134. http://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2021.0038
  87. Peralta A.F., Kertesz J., Iniguez G. (2022). Opinion dynamics in social networks: From models to data. 2022_Opinion dynamics in social networks From models to data.pdf
  88. Jiang T. (2022). Studying opinion polarization on social media // Social Work and Social Welfare. V.4(2), Pp.232-241. https://doi.org/10.25082/SWSW.2022.02.003
  89. Echo chamber
  90. Shane T., Willaert T., Tuters M. (2022). The rise of “gaslighting”: debates about disinformation on Twitter and 4chan, and the possibility of a “good echo chamber” // Popular Communication. V. 20(3). Pp.178-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2022.2044042
  91. Chen J. (20221). Research on the Echo Chamber Effect // Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Vol. 638. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Public Art and Human Development (ICPAHD 2021). 2022_Research on the Echo Chamber Effect.pdf
  92. Törnberg P., Törnberg A. (2022). Inside a White Power echo chamber: Why fringe digital spaces are polarizing politics // New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221122915 2022_Inside a White Power echo chamber Why fringe digital spaces are polarizing politics.pdf
  93. Minici M., Cinus F., Monti C., Bonchi F., Manco G. (2022). Cascade-based Echo Chamber Detection // In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM ’22). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.04620
  94. Belief polarization
  95. Baumgaertner B., Justwan F. (2022). The preference for belief, issue polarization, and echo chambers // Synthese. V.200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03880-y
  96. Begby E. (2022). From Belief Polarization to Echo Chambers: A Rationalizing Account // Episteme, First View , Pp. 1 – 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2022.14
  97. Gene A., Iftekhar H. (2022). Belief polarization and Covid-19 // Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers. №10. Bank of Finland, Helsinki. https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:fi:bof-202209201384 2022_Belief Polarization and COVID-19.pdf
  98. Rekker R., Harteveld E. (2022). Understanding factual belief polarization: the role of trust, political sophistication, and affective polarization // Acta Politica. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-022-00265-4

Наиболее читаемые статьи этого автора (авторов)